banner



Home  ›  Viel Lärm Um Nichts Kurze Zusammenfassung

Viel Lärm Um Nichts Kurze Zusammenfassung

Written By Saturday, August 13, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Zusammenfassung

Neuroenhancement verspricht große Verheißungen: jetzt schon, und sicherlich umso mehr in der Zukunft, können wir unsere Denkfähigkeit erhöhen, die Aufmerksamkeit steigern, die Stimmungslage aufhellen, mehr mit unseren Sinnen wahrnehmen und mit mehr Sinnen wahrnehmen. Befürworter von Neuroenhancement nehmen oftmals bereitwillig an, dass durch diese Enhancements dice Lebensqualität der betroffenen Individuen erhöht wird. Die Steigerung der kognitiven Fähigkeiten oder, allgemeiner ausgedrückt, unserer Fähigkeiten im Allgemeinen mache unser Leben besser und darum sollten wir (Neuro-)enhancement befürworten (z.B. Harris 2007).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amundson R (2000) Against Normal Function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology & Biomedical Science 31(1): 33-53

    Google Scholar

  • Aristoteles (1985) Nikomachische Ethik. 4., durchgesehene Aufl., Bien G (Hg) Hamburg

    Google Scholar

  • Asch A, Wasserman D (2005) Where is the sin in synecdoche? Prenatal testing and the parent-child relationship. In: Wasserman D, Bickenbach J, Wachbroit R (2005): 172-216

    Google Scholar

  • Bentham J (1823) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. A new edition, corrected by the author. Oxford

    Google Scholar

  • Boyd NF, et al. (1990) Whose Utilities for Determination Analysis? Medical Determination Making 10(1): 58-67

    Google Scholar

  • Brickman P, Coates D, Janoff-Bulman R (1978) Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of personality and social psychology 36(8): 917-927

    Google Scholar

  • Brocher-Hastings Summer Academy on Human Enhancement (2011) Abstracts & Bio

    Google Scholar

  • Buchanan A, et al. (2001) From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar

  • Crisp R (2013) Well-Beingness. In: Zalta EN (Hg) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/well-existence/ [Accessed September 5, 2012]

  • Dijkers MP (1999) Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 80(viii): 867-876

    Google Scholar

  • Eilers K, Grüber Grand, Rehmann-Sutter C (Hg) (2012) Verbesserte Körper – gutes Leben? Bioethik, Enhancement und dice Disability Studies. Frankfurt

    Google Scholar

  • Fröding B (2011) Cognitive Enhancement, Virtue Ethics and the Skillful Life. Neuroethics, 4(3): 223-234.

    Google Scholar

  • Goering S (2008) "Yous Say Y'all're Happy, merely…": Contested Quality of Life Judgments in Bioethics and Disability Studies. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5(2): 125-135

    Google Scholar

  • Griffin J (1986) Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford

    Google Scholar

  • Hahn Hard disk, Belt TL (2004) Inability Identity and Attitudes Toward Cure in a Sample of Disabled Activists. Periodical of Wellness and Social Behavior 45(4): 453-464

    Google Scholar

  • Harris J (2007) Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Example for Making Better People. Princeton

    Google Scholar

  • Haybron DM (2008) The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being. Oxford

    Google Scholar

  • Heathwood C (2010) Welfare. In: Skorupski J (2010): 645-655

    Google Scholar

  • Hensel E, et al. (2002) Subjective judgements of quality of life: a comparison study between people with intellectual disability and those without disability. Periodical of Intellectual Inability Enquiry 46(ii): 95-107

    Google Scholar

  • Hope T (2011) Cerebral Therapy and Positive Psychology Combined: A Promising Approach to the Enhancement of Happiness. In: Savulescu J, ter Meulen R, Kahane Thou (2011): 377-399

    Google Scholar

  • Kraut R (2009) What Is Good and Why: The Ethics of Well-Being. Cambridge

    Google Scholar

  • Lannering B, et al. (1990) Long-term sequelae after pediatric brain tumors: Their effect on inability and quality of life. Medical and Pediatric Oncology 18(4): 304-310

    Google Scholar

  • Manufacturing plant JS (1863) Utilitarianism. London

    Google Scholar

  • Morris S (2006) Twisted lies: My journeying in an imperfect torso. In: Parens East (2006): 3-12

    Google Scholar

  • Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York

    Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum Yard, Sen A (Hg) (1993) The Quality of life. Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar

  • Oliver 1000 (1990) The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. London

    Google Scholar

  • Parens E (Hg) (2006) Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, And the Pursuit of Normality. Baltimore

    Google Scholar

  • Parfit D (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford

    Google Scholar

  • Ralston DC, Ho JH (Hg) (2010) Philosophical Reflections on Disability. Dordrecht

    Google Scholar

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Cambridge/London

    Google Scholar

  • Rehmann-Sutter C (2012) Können und wünschen können. In: Eilers Thousand, Grüber K, Rehmann-Sutter C (2012): 63-86

    Google Scholar

  • Sackett DL, Torrance GW (1978) The utility of different health states as perceived by the full general public. Journal of Chronic Diseases 31(eleven): 697-704

    Google Scholar

  • Savulescu J (2007) In defence of Procreative Beneficence. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(5): 284-288

    Google Scholar

  • Savulescu J (2009) Autonomy, Well-Existence, Disease, and Disability. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 16(1): 59-65

    Google Scholar

  • Savulescu J, Kahane G (2009) The moral obligation to create children with the all-time chance of the best life. Bioethics 23(5): 274-290

    Google Scholar

  • Savulescu J, Sandberg A, Kahane Yard (2011) Well-being and enhancement. In: Savulescu J, ter Meulen R, Kahane G (2011): 3-18

    Google Scholar

  • Savulescu J, ter Meulen R, Kahane One thousand (Hg) (2011): Enhancing Human being Capacities. Malden

    Google Scholar

  • Schermer G (2003) In search of 'the skilful life' for demented elderly. Medicine, Health Intendance and Philosophy vi(ane): 35-44

    Google Scholar

  • Shakespeare T (2006) Disability rights and wrongs. London/New York

    Google Scholar

  • Silvers A (Hg) (1998) Disability, difference, discrimination: perspectives on justice in bioethics and public policy. New York/Oxford

    Google Scholar

  • Skorupski J (Hg) (2010) The Routledge Companion to Ideals. New York

    Google Scholar

  • Sumner LW (1996) Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford

    Google Scholar

  • Tännsjö T (2009) Ought We to Enhance Our Cognitive Capacities? Bioethics 23(vii): 421-432

    Google Scholar

  • Tännsjö T (2010) Utilitarianism, Disability, and Guild. In: Ralston DC, Ho JH (2010): 91-108

    Google Scholar

  • Terzi L (2004): The social model of disability: A philosophical critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21(2): 141-157

    Google Scholar

  • Tremain Due south (2001) On the government of disability. Social theory and practice 27(4): 617-636

    Google Scholar

  • Ubel PA, Loewenstein K, Jepson C (2003) Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health country evaluations of patients and the full general public. Quality of Life Research 12(6): 599-607

    Google Scholar

  • Verri A, et al. (1999) An Italian–Australian comparison of quality of life among people with intellectual disability living in the customs. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 43(6): 513-522

    Google Scholar

  • Wasserman D, Bickenbach J, Wachbroit R (Hg) (2005) Quality of Life and Man Difference: Genetic Testing, Wellness Care, and Disability. New York

    Google Scholar

  • Wasserman D, et al. (2011) Disability: Definitions, Models, Feel. In: Zalta EN (Hg) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/inability/ [Accessed June 6, 2012]

  • Wasserman D, Bickenbach J, Wachbroit R (2005) Introduction. In: Wasserman D, Bickenbach J, Wachbroit R (2005): 1-26

    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medewerkers Geesteswetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Niederlande

    Caroline Harnacke & Ineke Bolt

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Harnacke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Gesellschaftsw. und Soziale Arbeit, Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

    Nicola Erny

  2. Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany

    Dr. Matthias Herrgen

  3. Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Hochschule Darmstadt , Darmstadt, Hessen, Federal republic of germany

    Dr. January C. Schmidt

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

Near this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harnacke, C., Bolt, I. (2018). Viel Lärm um nichts?. In: Erny, Due north., Herrgen, Chiliad., Schmidt, J. (eds) Dice Leistungssteigerung des menschlichen Gehirns. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/x.1007/978-3-658-03683-6_8

Download commendation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB

  • DOI : https://doi.org/ten.1007/978-iii-658-03683-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03682-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03683-half-dozen

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Source: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-03683-6_8

Posted by: gillettearnifew.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Viel Lärm Um Nichts Kurze Zusammenfassung"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel